Document obtained from the "CIA computer" on the third floor of the National Archives in College Park, MD, on January 11th, 2002. Author and publication date unknown. From the bibliography one could infer it was written some time in the early 1970s. - Paul
Images of pages online at http://www.derechos.net/paulwolf/colombia/counterterror.htm
Approved For Release 1999/09/24: CIA-RDP85-00671ROO0200250001-4
COUNTERTERRORIST PROGRAM PRIMER
I. SUMMARY
1. Offensive Terror
2. Defensive Terror
3. Counterterror
II. TERRORIST METHODS
1. Propaganda and Agitation
2. Assassination and Kidnapping
3. Infiltration
4. Bombing and Sabotage
5. Armed Attacks
6. Mob Violence
III. COUNTERTERRORIST TOOLS
IV. THREAT ANALYSIS
1. Terrorist Fact Sheet
2. Possible Terrorist Objectives
3. Terrorist Potential
V. DEFENSIVE MEASURES
1. Essential Elements of Support
2. Local Security Checklist
3. Preparation of Operational Environment
4. Personal/Physical Factors
5. Communication Related Defense
6. Terrorist Activity Gaming
7. ITC System
8. Deception
9. File Systems
10. Essential Equipment
11. Pre-Crises Pointers
VI. INCIDENT PROCEDURES
1. Protective Reaction Chart
2. Reaction Questionnaire
3. Immediate Response
4. Hostage Location
5. Potential Hostage Notes
VII. TERRORIST EXEMPLARS
VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. SUMMARY
OFFENSIVE TERROR
Threats, violence and coercion form the basis of offensive terror. Terrorism
is used to reduce effectively resistance to the aims of its proponents. It is
the means to (1) demoralize governmental authority; (2) separate a people from
their leaders; (3) paralyze opposition forces; (4) shock the indifferent; (5)
agitate and influence; (6) build terrorist morale; (7) enforce conformity or
compliance; (8) eliminate an enemy; (9) advertise and initiate a revolutionary
movement; (10) destroy group or population solidarity; (11) disorient a mass;
and provoke repressive government countermeasures which will antagonize the
population concerned.
Terror ruthlessly applied is a powerful and effective weapon so long as it
is not employed clumsily or to excesses which stimulate general population
alienation against the terrorists. Further, it can only be applied for short
durations or its effectiveness will be diminished as the population becomes
accustomed to living under these conditions. It is, therefore, imperative
that terrorist actions be planned to evoke a high but short-term state of
fear, dread, or anxiety among its target population. If terror is not measured
to accomplish these conditions, it cannot hope to attain favorable results for
the terrorists or their sponsors.
Given the above considerations, terrorism may not be effective unless it is
climactic and successful in its initial stages. All preparatory action must
therefore be clandestine and premature acts of violence cannot be permitted.
The preparatory phase of terrorism represents the most important and crucial
period. Dedicated covert leadership is needed to begin the process of
clandestine organization. Motivated manpower with ideology must be spotted,
recruited, trained and secretly formulated into small compartmented action
"cells." Financial and material resources, plus related supporting mechanisms
are essential if terrorist action is to be undertaken with sufficient impact.
Agents or informants must be recruited and trained to provide target
intelligence required for discriminate or indiscriminate acts of violence.
Technical skills and specialized equipment will need to be acquired for
bombing operations or unique approaches to assassination. Tactics must be
rehearsed generally without secure use of any geographic area or facility.
And last but not least, the means must be achieved to provide communication,
dispersion of assets, command and control plus tactical mobility.
Having completed all preparatory action secretly among an infinitesimal
portion of the population, a well-planned terrorist campaign is launched
suddenly by the conduct of massive acts of violence that occur simultaneously
over a wide area. The resultant shock effect may be expected to create highly
desirable psychological responses, and perhaps temporarily neutralize
opposition security forces. Taking advantage of this situation, the effective
terrorist organization can rapidly expand the level of violence until a
balance of power is achieved favoring the originators. Acts of terrorism can
then be dramatically decreased or curtailed until future needs demand a
resurgence.
During the conduct of the terror campaign, discriminate terrorism targets
selected leaders or individuals whose loss will severely handicap the "cause"
they represent. This selective violence is also used to disrupt government
machinery or impress specific groups by elimination of key personnel.
Indiscriminate terror is utilized to spread panic among the general population,
with the aim of eroding trust, authority and security. The general technique
includes bombing of restaurants, movies, hospitals, religious centers, and
transportation services, or assassination of people in the street. As a
general rule, this type of terror is most effective when it appears to have
no specific targets even though particular acts of violence may be highly
selective.
2. DEFENSIVE TERROR
If governments or independent groups become frustrated over their inability
to negate, offensive terror by legal means, they may resort to the employment
of violence to counter violence. The targets of such defensive terror include
opposition cadre, terrorists, and their supporting mechanisms. Since regimes
or individuals do not normally wish to become overtly involved in any
terrorist action, most defensive terror campaigns are conducted on a covert
basis.
Primary tactics of defensive terror include selective assassination and
bombing. Ancillary efforts may involve raids, ambush, kidnapping, torture
and harsh punishment without "due process." Normally, defensive acts of
violence are discriminate unless an easily identifiable population group
is directly responsible for offensive terror. Under such circumstances,
indiscriminate action against such groups may be thought justifiable, but
the government concerned would probably reap a harvest of accusations
charging brutal repression -- regardless of where the guilt may lie.
The fundamental problem with defensive terror is that violence begets more
violence and the general population usually becomes antagonistic toward
government because of this consequence. Even if government is not the actual
sponsor of defensive terror, suspicion and accusation will eventually lead
to an official image of brutal repression which does not enhance the legal
government's chances for survival. This reason, plus ethical and moral
considerations, will usually preclude any regimes consideration of this
technique.
3. COUNTERTERROR
First and most importantly, counterterror has no relationship to defensive
terror. Counterterror usually involves a combination of social, economic,
psychological, political, propaganda, intelligence, and internal security
actions designed to neutralize a terrorist force. Further, these actions
must be individually and/or collectively structured to erode the terrorists
basis of popular support.
Essential counterterrorist actions should include (1) development of
programs designed to meet "felt needs" and resolve conditions perceived
as being intolerable by various population elements; (2) upgrading of
security force capabilities to provide population protection and freedom
from fear; (3) effective utilization of "law and due process" to convince
the populace that government will defeat the subversives without utilizing
repressive measures; and (4) creation of institutional and governmental
mechanisms that provide the means for effective "change" without violence.
The developmental or modernization approach usually requires human,
technological and capital inputs at a rate which will provide substantial
agricultural and/or industrial growth. This is a long-term and complex
solution which cannot be achieved easily without adequate savings, trade,
aid or credit. In addition to the above inputs, markets must be developed;
producer incentives created; income and employment levels increased;
educational programs expanded; birth rates reduced to something less than
Gross National Product increases; and skilled manpower, energy sources,
raw materials, machinery or other capital items must be assembled at the
production point. Apart from these overall development efforts, dissident
and impoverished population elements should be provided with basic minimal
subsistence plus the opportunity for socio-economic self-advancement.
Security improvement programs should be based upon legislative actions
which provide the police and other internal defense forces with appropriate
increases in leadership, manpower, training, finance, communications,
mobility, weapons, equipment and material. Essential tactical innovations
will be discussed under the following section. The fundamental basis for
improving security operations is via better intelligence collection and
collation. Human/technical penetrations, agent or informant operations,
prisoner interrogation, communications intercept, and investigative
techniques all provide essential information inputs. Effective collation
of this data should result eventually in the identification of subversive
leadership, cadre, action and support elements, ideology, modus operandi,
organizational patterns, strength, capability, plans or intentions,
facilities, mechanisms, and other details.
In turn, the finished intelligence produced is used to provide targets
or operational leads and as legal evidence for judicial processing of
subversives.
Regarding "law and due process," it is essential that judicial procedures
be established to assure that violence control measures are politically,
legally and morally justifiable. This is particularly true of methods used
to arrest, detain, interrogate, convict and imprison or execute individual
members of a subversive movement. If repressive, brutal, or illegal tactics
are used by the government to attack subversive forces, popular sentiment
may favor success of the latter.
Creation of adaptive and responsible institutions provide government with
its most effective psychological weapon against violence. Assuming such
organizations provide the basis for peaceful constructive change, the
perpetrators of violence cannot justify their methods to a target populace.
In fact, history has proven that the urban guerrilla cannot long survive
in an environment where popular political, economic, or social aspirations
can be achieved by non-violent methods. Social unrest thrives on the
inability of a nation to modernize existing private or governmental
institutions in a manner which will facilitate the effective, peaceful
resolution of intolerable conditions. It is therefore essential that
government assure that there is an adaptive organizational basis for
reform, modernization and progressive change. This process must include
government bureaucracy, political parties, unions, cooperatives, youth
groups, and other private institutions.
II. TERRORIST METHODS
The following sub-sections provide a general synopsis of terrorist
methodology.
1. PROPAGANDA AND AGITATION
In order to be successful, most subversive movements must convince a
majority of a target population that the conditions under which they exist
are intolerable. This attitude will then provide the motivation and "cause"
needed to stimulate the popular dissidence essential to ruining or
overthrowing any government.
Propaganda comes in many and varied forms to include (1) leaflets; (2)
letter campaigns; (3) wall slogans; (4) rumors; (5) oratory; and (6) radio,
newspapers or other media. However, the latter forum exists only where free
speech is guaranteed or for low-level efforts which might not be suppressed.
Agitation is usually accomplished by agents of influence who seize upon
controversial issues to "inflame" specific audiences for the purpose of
stimulating the development of particular attitudes, actions or reactions.
These individuals usually focus their attention on labor, student or other
population organizations that have banded together because of common
interests they wish to protect or promote. By identifying with their cause,
the agitator can thus seek to exploit any known grievance.
2. ASSASSINATION AND KIDNAPPING
The urban guerrillas may employ assassination and/or kidnapping operations
to eliminate "key" leaders within government or the private sector.
Liquidation of existing leadership is the oldest method of revolution and
affords a relatively simple means to dislocate or disorganize political-
social-economic institutions.
Targets many be limited to "heads" of state, representatives of government,
local leaders, or other individuals who act to support the status quo. The
primary aim of a systematic campaign of assassination is to alienate a
populace from their government by establishing the omnipotent power of the
guerrillas. Kidnapping operations may also be designed to accomplish this
same objective, and to extract concessions, capture publicity, provoke
controversy or free political prisoners. Targets for kidnapping may also
include foreign diplomats or business executives and various personalities
who might be useful for propaganda purposes. In some cases, the kidnap
victim may be executed after his usefulness has ended, so that net effect
is that of a combined kidnapping and assassination.
Individuals or select three to five-man guerrilla teams are usually
employed to conduct the above types of operations. Normally, such
individuals are selected on the basis of their proven courage,
dedication, resourcefulness and cunning. Preferably, they are not
persons wanted by the authorities, but ordinary citizens capable of
moving about freely. Assassinations or kidnappings are planned in
detail and special surveillance parties first check on the movements
of prospective victims. The target is shadowed to learn his habits,
hours, movement patterns and usual security procedures. When a pattern
is established, the guerrillas then develop and rehearse their specific
modus operandi.
3. INFILTRATION*
*As used in this case, the word infiltration is synonymous with
penetration.
The security and operational potential of an urban guerrilla force is
usually predicated on the quantity of intelligence obtained by successful
infiltration. If police and internal security organizations can be
penetrated, the guerrillas may thus be forewarned of actions planned
against them. The infiltration of security forces was seen by Lenin as
one of the essential preconditions for a successful urban uprising.
Lenin's theory being that urban guerrillas would always be outgunned
unless they neutralize the police and other security elements by
infiltrating their own agents at all levels.
In addition, the subversive movement cannot be expected to succeed unless
it attacks and erodes any official programs designed to establish or
sustain population confidence in government. To help accomplish this goal,
the urban guerrillas will attempt to infiltrate all elements of the target
regime. The net objective is to obtain information which can be used to
plan disruptive or destructive attacks against socio-economic development
projects or other programs designed to alleviate popular grievances.
Select infiltration operations may be used to obtain specific target
intelligence, particularly as regards procurement of funds, weapons, or
other supplies. Penetration agents can also provide information on
potential targets for terrorist, sabotage, assassination and kidnap
operations.
Classic clandestine "tradecraft" techniques are used as the basis for
organizing and accomplishing infiltration operations.
We are first concerned with human penetrations and to a lesser degree,
theft, bribery, technical penetrations and other ancillary types of
espionage. However, the primary danger is that guerrillas may obtain a
popular following from among elements of the population having existing
intelligence access. This situation will then create a more spontaneous
flow of information which the urban guerrillas can use for protection or
advantage.
4. BOMBING & SABOTAGE
The essential purpose of bombing or sabotage is effective disruption of
the economic-political-security activities within a state whose government
is targeted for ruin or overthrow. It is a tactic that may be employed by
urban guerrillas and terrorists, or by specialized "cells." Fundamental
objectives include: (1) reduction of agricultural and industrial production;
(2) impeding the effective functioning of essential services such as
communication, transportation and utilities; (3) limiting the conduct of
various government activities with emphasis on internal security services
and political machinery; and/or (4) "cowing" of a target population.
Most of the above is based upon covert destructive attack using explosives,
combustibles, abrasives or subtle disruptive action. Methods include: (1)
descriminate or indescriminate bombing; (2) mechanical breakage; (3) use
of damaging chemicals; (4) arson; (5) electronic interruptions; (6)
pilferage of vital components; (7) dissemination of incorrect information,
falsification of data, misfiling and records manipulation; (8) tampering;
(9) fatal "flawing" of materials or equipment; (10) work slowdown; (11)
interruption of command or control procedures, and (12) use of laws,
courts, and parliamentary rules to impede the effective functioning of
government.
The extensive employment of various bombing and sabotage techniques
affords the revolutionary with a relatively secure and inexpensive weapon
that can have disastrous consequences on the economy and security of a
state. Further, the systematic employment of same erodes public morale
and confidence in government while advertising the success and apparent
invincibility of subversive forces.
5. ARMED ATTACKS
Terrorist groups may employ snipers or "firing groups" of four or five men
which may undertake limited hit and run attacks to erode popular confidence
in government security forces and to force the initiation of repressive
acts antagonistic to a target populace. Weapons include rifles, shotguns,
pistols, grenades, Molotov cocktails, explosives and other lightweight,
easily concealable items. Targets may be discriminately or indiscriminately
selected. Police, firemen, government officials, foreign diplomats or
businessmen and leaders of moderating forces are high on the discriminate
list. Indiscriminate targets are usually selected to incite population
fear. These armed action groups may also be used to undertake robbery,
kidnapping, assassination or other select activity in support of overall
subversive objectives.
In the urban environrnent, such guerrilla action is at close quarters
for extremely short duration. Specific tactics will depend on the target,
the metropolitan terrain, attack options, movement alternatives, type of
weapons, accepted modus operandi and the potential for surprise/retreat.
The net effect being a great diversification of tactical approach from
one situation to another.
6. MOB VIOLENCE
Street tactics of the terrorist or urban guerrillas include the
instigation and/or manipulation of demonstrations, mobs, and strikes.
The objective is to create a situation wherein peaceful protect groups
can be agitated to participate in acts of civil disobedience or riot.
Agents of influence and subversive agitators may seize upon any popular
grievance to stimulate the formation of protest groups. The next objective
is for agitators to encourage the type of public demonstration that could
easily "flare" into a confrontation with police.
Having created a proper environment, various guerrilla elements can
infiltrate the street mobs to incite a riot or undertake acts of violence
using the protestors for cover.
Tactics are simple. Bottles, bricks, and stones can be hurled at police.
Hasty barricades may be used to block streets. Business establishments,
factories and/or government buildings can be looted or burned. Snipers
can be deployed to fire at police, hoping they in turn will retaliate by
killing innocent members of the mob. When the police attempt to arrest
an agitator, a larger group of urban guerrillas may attempt to aid his
escape. If internal security forces effectively contain the riot, the
guerrillas will retreat along pre-planned avenues of escape.
The primary objective of such group agitation is to force the government
to take strong repressive measures, thereby further alienating the
population. Promoting general disorder also helps to disrupt the economy
and undermine the government. Last but not least, by organizing social
discontent, the urban guerrillas induce the population to accept their
leadership, while demonstrating the regime's lack of authority.
Basic ingredients for group agitation include: (1) leadership trained
in mob psychology and tactics; (2) an executive committee responsible
for overall planning and execution; (3) propaganda efforts to rally
public sympathy for a cause; (4) compilation and continuous review of
exploitable grievances; (5) registration of potential dissidents; (6)
study of overall environment; (7) profiling of radical organizations;
(8) enlistment of financial and moral support; (9) tactical training
for agitators; (10) development of community support; (11) recruitment
of "crowd-moving" orators; (12) preparation of music, chants and
slogans; (13) creation of demands and ultimatums; (14) planning for
pivotal events designed to precipitate conflicts; (15) public
announcement of time and place for planned demonstration; (16)
stimulation of actions to incite media coverage; and (17) encouraging
demonstators to participate in dramatic mass arrests.
By effective manipulation of mob psychology, the urban guerrilla thus
plans to push the aggrieved citizen into outright breaches of law that
will lead to heightened outbursts of violence. In addition, all-out
revolution must be rapidly precipitated or mob participants will lose
stamina in the face of prolonged adversity. To succeed, group agitation
must be carefully timed to coincide and "peak" with other guerrilla
actions.
III. COUNTERTERRORIST TOOLS
An effective counterterrorist program must incorporate most if not all
of the working tools described herein.
Terrorist Profiles - can be used to provide security personnel with a
classic thumbnail description of individuals who warrant close scrutiny
as potential participants in acts of violence. This approach facilitatess
narrowing the focus of investigative and intelligence operations designed
to identify members of terrorist organizations. Further, the profile
improves routine observation by police and other authorities responsible
for internal security.
An example profile of a potential terrorist might indicate basic
characteristics to include: (1) male or female age 16 to 58; (2) member
of potentially dissident group; (3) person with emotional or fanatical
tendency; (4) individual who has evidenced violent behavior or emotional
instability; (5) citizens who are isolated from the national
socioeconomic or political "mainstream"; (6) radicals who have engaged
in demands for revolutionary change; and (7) individuals who obviously
have nothing to lose by engaging in terrorism.
Potential terrorist traits should be adjusted to fit each particular
local or national environment. The main objective being to create a
system that is easily developed and readily applied by all security or
intelligence personnel.
Documentation Controls - facilitate security forces in their efforts
to identify suspect terrorists and their supporters. Population
identification papers should be designed to allow the police to spot-
check any individual's name, date and place of birth, residence,
family status, employment, race, religion, and physical description.
Photographs and fingerprints can also be added to documents. In cases
of emergency, citizens may be required to obtain special documentation
for travel and resource control permits for the purchase of any item
that might be used to aid a terrorist act.
The intended objective of detailed documentation is to aid the screening
of dissident population elements. When used in conjunction with terrorist
profiles and when properly focused on areas where violence has occurred
the system can be effective in providing investigative leads.
Biographic Registry - involves the establishment of a central security
reference containing biographic card files or computer data on all
known criminals, subversives, terrorists, dissidents and suspicious
personalities. Each security and intelligence service would provide
appropriate biographic inputs, and have controlled access to the
complete registry. Sources and information would be protected by
appropriate compartmentation and security clearance procedures.
In effect, a national biographic reference is created to facilitate
collation of all source intelligence on confirmed or suspect terrorists.
If the quality and quantity of information inputs are adequate, all
security personnel can use existing files as the basis for rapidly
determining any persons possible association with terrorist or
subversive activity. By establishing secure radio procedures for
sending queries to the biographic registry, any policemen with
appropriate communication can immediately validate the suspect status
of individuals, stopped for spot-checks.
The biographic registry does not negate the need to investigate or
collect intelligence on potential terrorists having or not having files,
but it does preclude suspect persons from easily going unnoticed.
Personnel & Physical Security - must necessarily be provided for
the indigenous leaders and government personnel who will likely be
targeted for terrorist violence. This requirement includes protection
of individuals from threats, coercion, assassination and bombing; the
latter action prompting the need for physical security of offices,
homes, meeting places and transportation facilities.
General defensive procedures include: (1) personnel security clearances;
(2) entry and exit control for offices; (3) protective fences for fixed
facilities; (4) guards for personnel and buildings; (5) screening of
communications, mail and cargo; (6) use of metal detectors for routine
weapons search; (7) utilization of bomb squads with dogs trained to
smell out plastic explosives; (8) travel control procedures emphasizing
alternate routes and various methods of transportation; (9) street
patrols in the area of offices and individual homes; and (10) other
techniques appropriate to environmental situations.
The primary objective of such elaborate precautions is to frustrate
the effective conduct of terrorist actions and thereby prevent those
spectacular successes which encourage expanded future violence.
To better focus defensive efforts and conserve resource allocation, it
is essential that hard intelligence be obtained on terrorist intentions
and modus operandi. This intelligence effort also provides the basis
for offensive actions designed to negate terrorist violence before it
can be employed. Personnel and physical security is thus achieved by a
combination of defensive and offensive programs, the latter of which
can be the most effective. The offensive methods will be discussed
further in subsequent sections.
Intelligence Collection - is essential to the conduct of effective
counterterror operations. Neutralization of violence is dependent upon
government having some knowledge of terrorist personalities, organization,
plans, intentions, ideology, modus operandi, and support mechanisms.
Without such knowledge, security forces will be unable to properly focus
defensive or offensive actions. Unfocused countermeasures are usually
doomed to failure since the terrorists will be largely unaffected.
Detailed information on terrorists can best be obtained by clandestine
human or technical penetration operations. Failing this, intelligence
must be gathered by alternate means to include: (1) recruitment of
informants; (2) suspect surveillance; (3) police investigation of
potential terrorists; (4) search for weapons, explosives, or other
incriminating evidence; (5) prisoner interrogation: (6) monitoring of
possible targets and suspected terrorist supply sources; and (7) mass
population education in observation and reporting techniques related to
terrorist activity.
To narrow the focus of the above collection operations, demographic
data and terrorist profiles can be used, to fix specific geographic
areas where terrorists could reside and organize with some degree of
relative safety. Although terrorists may operate anywhere, they
normally maintain their residence and meeting places among dissident
population elements who evidence negative or hostile reaction to
government security forces. This fact, therefore, allows selective
elimination of those urban and rural areas which would not provide a
hospitable terrorist environment.
Physical data on roads, communication facilities, residential
patterns, buildings, and isolated areas can also be used to help
determine likely patterns of terrorist organizational activity within
suspect geographic areas. Trash collectors, building inspectors,
electricians and other personnel with natural access can be recruited
to aid collection of this physical information. Again, this effort
further serves to pinpoint where intelligence operations should be
targeted.
Counterintelligence/counterespionage operations will also be needed
to supplement the above efforts. The objective of these operations
includes: (1) penetrating and manipulating terrorist cells; (2)
stopping, disrupting, misorienting or negating terrorist intelligence
collection activities; and (3) developing passive or specialized
defenses against planned terrorist acts of violence.
In summary, intelligence and counterintelligence operations form the
foundation for counterterror campaigns. Those security services or
personnel not familiar with essential clandestine tradecraft should
seek appropriate guidance and assistance.
Intelligence Collation - provides the detailed compilation and
analysis of information needed to help identify, arrest and convict
the perpetrators of violence. It also facilitates the location and
elimination of terrorist support mechanisms and other hard targets.
To function effectively, any collation center must have access to all
sources of information. This implies cooperation with all security and
intelligence services using appropriate clearances, "source" protection
and compartmentation. In addition, the centers must have the legal
right to pinpoint specific targets and assign collection or action
requirements to individual government components. Without such
follow-on authority, the collation centers become little more than
repositories of unexploited intelligence.
All source information inputs should include: (1) biographic data;
(2) pertinent socioeconomic, demographic and geographic publications;
(3) details on transportation, communications, and material resources;
(4) target assessments; (5) analysis of terrorist organizations and
modus operandi; and (6) all reporting on criminals, dissidents, radicals,
subversives or terrorists. After collecting every scrap of available
information, trained analysts then collate data with the objective of
developing investigative and target leads.
The primary advantage to central collation is simply that all available
pieces of an investigative puzzle are laid before personnel experienced
in the art of formulating a composite intelligence picture which
provides the sharpest available detail on any terrorist organization.
If this collation process is absent or fragmented, any intelligence
produce cannot be properly exploited and subsequent counterterror
activities may be expected to be largely ineffective. It is, therefore,
imperative that any government targeted by terrorists seek to establish
the best possible intelligence collation system.
Security Force Requirements - generally include: (1) defense of
official personnel and physical facilities; (2) riot control, bomb
disposal and population protection from acts of violence; (3)
enforcement of law and order; (4) preparation for national defense
against internal or external acts of aggression; (5) investigation
leading to location, arrest, and conviction of criminals, dissidents,
subversives or terrorists; and (6) other actions required to resist
lawlessness, violence, subversion and warfare originating within or
outside the state.
The conduct of counterterror operations primarily burdens police forces
with the requirement to provide population fredom from fear and violence,
while undertaking legal investigation which will ultimately result in
conviction and punishment of terrorists after "due process." As
previously stated, the foundation for this effort is based upon adequate
intelligence collection which may be a primary or secondary function of
various security services.
Once intelligence leads are provided, the lengthy and arduous process
begins to obtain sufficient evidence for a court trial which will
prove the suspect terrorist guilty of accomplished or planned crimes of
violence. This requirement demands the skills and extensive application
of modern criminal investigation. It is, therefore, suggested that
appropriate actions be undertaken to provide police or other security
forces with adequate authority, leadership, manpower, funds, training
and equipment needed to accomplish the task.
Under most circumstances, it is recommended that target governments
seek whatever resources deemed necessary to upgrade security forces
and give them the capability to deal with terrorists by action within
existing legal parameters. Even though this is often the most difficult
course of action, it has proven to be the most successful.
Population Mobilization - is initiated by advising the target nation's
citizenry of the nature of any terrorist threat and motivating mass
popular participation in negating acts of violence. To accomplish this
objective, the populace should be organized and instructed in the
techniques of aiding security forces in the identification of possible
terrorists.
The latter may be accomplished by launching an aggressive educational
program designed to establish citizen procedures for reporting suspicious
activities or personalities that are observed by local inhabitants.
Carried to its ultimate conclusion, each village and city block would
have resident protection committees with direct communications to local
police forces. Possible investigative leads would thus be immediately
relayed for exploitation by security forces.
The unique advantage of such citizen participation is based on the fact
that local residents are most keenly aware of unusual events or the
appearance of strangers in their neighborhoods. Another obvious benefit
is the increase in numbers of eyes and ears that terrorists will be
forced to avoid.
Actual techniques of population mobilization will vary according to
environmental situations and citizen receptivity or motivation.
Procedural approaches are the same as for so-called "block warning
systems." As stated in the introductory note, implementation should
not be attempted prior to consultation with appropriate specialists.
Judicial Base - is created by formulating those laws which fully support
security forces in their conduct of counterterror operations. In addition,
such laws should insure that all efforts are politically, legally and
morally justifiable. This is particularly true of methods used to arrest,
detain, interrogate, convict and imprison or execute individual members
of a terrorist movement.
IV. THREAT ANALYSIS
1. TERRORIST FACT SHEET
1. Who are they, how many, how organized, what is their motivation, and
what are their basic objectives?
2. What are their linguistic, technical and communications capabilities?
3. Where located, how armed, how equipped, current status, and degree of
mobility?
4. What are their psychological and/or physical vulnerabilities?
5. How its command and control exercised?
6. What are the terrorists' probable courses of action under any given
set of circumstances?
7. When, where and how might essential and/or minimal outside support be
provided?
8. What are the minimum concessions the terrorists will accept in exchange
for hostage release?
2. POSSIBLE TERRORIST OBJECTIVES
1. Publicity; propaganda, and/or influence.
2. Political concessions.
3. Finance by ransom of hostages and/or aircraft, etc.
4. Release of fellow terrorists.
S. Expanded control via induced fear.
6. World-wide attention to grievances they have been unable to resolve
by legal means.
7. Elimination of principal opponents.
8 Consternation among all the groups, factions, and/or nations who
oppose their "cause".
9. Expanded use. of target government repressive measures which tend
to create sympathy for the terrorists.
3. TERRORIST POTENTIAL
1. What dissident, subversive, terrorist or other elements reside
within the country?
2. Do international or third-country terrorist organizations have
support and/or action components assigned to the ccountry?
3. What is the record and modus operandi or post terrorist operations,
and what is the frequency of incidents?
4. If specific persons were targeted as potential victims, where would
terrorists probably initiate the kidnapping or seizure? For a hostage,
where would they probably be held?
6. What factors regarding activities and/or movement patterns
unnecessarily expose potential victims to a possible kidnapping?
7. In cases of seizures, airline skyjackings, or other mass hostage
operations, why might particular individuals be singled out?
8. What unusual events normally proceed a terrorist kidnapping or
seizure -- either within or outside the country?
9. What disposition is usually made of the hostages of those terrorist
groups with which you are familiar and what time factors are involved?
10. In cases of negotiated release, what individuals or groups might be
used as a go-between?
11. What are the usual communication channels or systems used by
terrorists for command control and/or negotiations?
12. What is the ethnic and psychological profile of those terrorist
leaders with whom you might come in contact, and what are their
grievances or political objectives?
13. Have terrorists tended to panic, upon learning they are threatened
or that governments will not bargain for release of hostages?
14. Under what conditions have most hostages been held, and what
circumstances have led to their release or execution?
V. DEFENSIVE MEASURES
1. ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF SUPPORT.
1. Judicial: Laws must be established which facilitate the effective
functioning of those intelligence and security operations essential
to the conduct of counterterror programs without the creation of a
repressive police state which will antagonize the populations concerned.
2. Legislative: Governing bodies must enact and sustain the above
process of law, while creating the financial and other resources needed
to accomplish same.
3. Social: Institutional process should be created to provide
opportunities for personal social advancement and the peaceful
resolution of individual grievances regardless of sex, religion,
creed, language, ethnic origin, status, or other differences.
4. Economic: Each individual should be afforded the means of
subsistance, and the opportunity to attain basic felt needs, e.g.
housing, clothing, and essential material goods.
5. Psychological: Popular attitudes must be created which discredit
the terrorist "cause" and the violent methods used to attain their
objective -- and at the same time the population must be convinced
that the government should, can, and will prevail without resorting to
violence to counter violence.
6. Political: Governments should create and/or sponsor a political
system which fosters the means for peaceful changes of leadership, the
need or justification for violent overthrow of any regime.
7. Media: Newspaper, radio, and television should be encouraged to
avoid giving terrorists free publicity of the type which would engender
sympathy or support from the general population.
8. Security: Intelligence and internal security services must provide
the population with freedom from fear while identifying, apprehending,
convicting, and imprisoning terrorists via due process of law.
9. Population: Various elements of the populace should be organized
into "block" or village security committees to provide advance alert
of any terrorist activity -- assuming all the above actions have first
been implemented and have motivated the population to become so
involved.
10. Leadership: All government and institutional leaders administrators
should fully support and underwrite the counterterror campaign. They
must provide the management, direction, coordination, and resource
inputs which assures the development and continuation of an effective
program.
NOTE: It is imperative that advance determination be made regarding
establishment of priorities and division of labor regarding what
private and/or governmental institutions have responsibility for the
above actions.
[NEXT TWO PAGES IN DOCUMENT REDACTED]
25XIC10C
4. PERSONAL/PHYSICAL FACTORS
1. Instruct all potential targeted personnel to periodically alter
modes, times and routes of movement.
Z. Where possible, they should avoid making advance appointments or
establishing routine schedules.
3. Limit regular travel by personal vehicle unless plans are made for
en route protection, e.g., armed escort, scout vehicles, car armoring,
street patrols, defensive driving, car pool, car swapping, random
routes or other techniques.
4. Fence private residences and utilize dogs, geese, ducks and/or guinea
fowl to provide exterior alarm while installing adequate hardware to
preclude a hasty forced entry. (If the situation warrants, guards should
also be considered.)
5. Armed guards, alarms, fences, control zones, hardware and other
protective procedures should be used to deter all possible types of
hostiles against office.
6. Periodic security investigations should be conducted on all employees
having access to residences, vehicles and/or place of work of potential
targets.
7. Initiate or accelerate efforts focused on terrorist organizations
and their sponsors or supporters.
8. Assist security forces in screening, all internal and external
travelers for suspect terrorists or persons having similar profile.
9. Surveil the movements of all foreign diplomats or other persons who
might offer communications or other support for terrorists.
10. Photograph and surveil all strangers moving in or out of foreign
embassies sympathetic to the terrorist cause.
11. Establish "block warning systems" whereby local residents can
immediately alert security forces if suspect persons or activity is
observed.
12. Train all potential targets in countersurveillance techniques and
specific security precautions that may be used for personal defense.
13. Qualify selected individuals in the use of small arras and provide
them with appropriate weapons.
14. Retain maps of all potential target areas to include floor plans
and defense plan for key buildings.
15. Check airline passenger lists and hotel registrations on a daily
basis against known terrorist list by true names and aliases.
16. Stimulate security forces to maintain port of entry surveillance
and tighten passport/visa control.
17. When appropriate, utilize technical penetration and/or wire taps
to monitor points of terrorist contact or support.
18. Watch for thefts of automobiles, or weapons and relate stolen
items to plausible terrorist operational concepts.
19. Restrict movement and set curfews as needed.
5. COMMUNICATION RELATED DEFENSE
1. Establish periodic radio or telephone check-in procedures whereby all
personnel advise their location and status to an alert center having the
authority and capability to immediately react to determine why an officer
has failed to make his safety report on time and to initiate appropriate
action as needed.
2. Equip potential target personnel with beacons or other emergency
devices that can be used to relay immediate alert when an attack occurs.
3. Organize and periodically test various lines of expedient communication
with internal security services who will be called upon to react in the
event of any hostile action against personnel.
4. Provide for alternate means of communication with all higher
headquarters in the event primary facilities are seized or otherwise
rendered inoperative.
5. Prepare and advise all personnel of word, phrase, gestures or other
codes which may be used by hostages to relay information by phone,
letter or via intermediaries.
6. Develop necessary contingency plans to control, monitor, block, jam
or cut all communications which might be used by any terrorist group.
7. Pre-position equipment and technicians to facilitate immediate
employment of remote listening devices, direction finding systems and
other specialized communication related items.
8. Pre-determine probable conditions under which media coverage may
be granted in exchange for concessions from terrorists. In any event,
arrange to prevent, guide, limit and/or control media coverage of any
terrorist incident until it has reached conclusion.
9. Equip potential targets with push-button activated sirens, flares,
floodlights and other systems should be considered for aiding emergency
alert and/or as a means to "foil" an attack.
10. Create a command control center with constant 24-hour communications,
and the established capability to coordinate all resources that might be
used to deter, negate or react to a terrorist attack. (Therein, establish
the focal [sic] for intelligence collation and analysis to provide
potential advance alert to all hostile actions.)
11. Be prepared to record all conversations during any terrorist
incident to facilitate on-going and/or after-action analysis.
12. Maintain an open communication or dialogue with all security
services and/or potential intermediaries.
6. TERRORIST ACTIVITY GAMING
Experience has generally proven that various terrorist groups eventually
evolve stereotyped operational procedures that develop as a result of:
(1) standardized organization, doctrine and training; (2) limited quantity
or quality of available men, money and material; (3) target area social,
economic, political, psychological and security strengths or weaknesses:
(4) communication, transportation, support and intelligence limitations;
(5) climate, weather, demography and geography; and (6) types of
countermeasures which must be overcome. Systematic analysis of these
influencing factors thus facilitates the development of hostile activity
signal patterns which may be used as an aid in terrorist strength,
location, deployment, modus operandi, and planned or intended actions.
A basic problem in developing such patterns is that most intelligence
analysts are unwilling or unable to postulate plausible theories relating
to suspected terrorist activity. A natural tendency is to avoid theoretical
hypothesis and relay solely on indicators substantiated by multiple source
intelligence. The lack of a theoretical framework thus deters sequential
logic development and deduction [until?] plausible operational approaches
can be proven or disproven by available data and known events. To further
complicate the analytical process, it is also recognized that sufficient
intelligence is seldom available with the quantity or quality needed to
forecast operational stereotypes. It is therefore essential that "gaps"
be filled by developing and testing all possible action options expressed
as theoretical operational alternatives. Probable terrorist actions should
be advanced by personnel experienced in operating with or against the
types of militant organizations with which any analysis is concerned. If
such expertise is not available, it is suggested that indigenous personnel
be employed in a role casting exercise. Ideally, groups of prisoners or
defectors can also be used to "game" particular problem situations
confronting those terrorist groups which they previously represented.
Initial operational theory should disregard available intelligence data.
Once all probable action alternatives are postulated, training analysts
may then be used to prove or disprove theoretical concepts. However,
actual events may be more useful in determining the validity of
particular theories. This, of course, assumes a careful analysis of
causal factors contributing to the timing and accomplishment of any
particular terrorist action.
Application and usefulness of any gaming model is thus dependent upon
proper development of a logic sequence predicted on theoretical concept
evaluated against intelligence data and known events.
The logic sequence itself is nothing more than the studied formulation
of operational hypothesis which are then supported or challenged by
all evidence and the process of deductive reasoning. As theoretical
concepts are proven valid, this then facilitates advance prediction
of intended terrorist action in situations where "hard" intelligence
is lacking.
Those persons attempting to use initial TAG models should not expect
100 percent accuracy. Basic pitfalls include: (1) failure to properly
read indicators; (2) signal patterns can be read out of context; (3)
terrorists may cancel or postpone intended actions; and (4) the
absence of partial reading of indicators may lead to false conclusions.
In addition to the above pitfalls, the system will probably not be
effective unless it is managed by an officer with some previous
operational experience against the general type of opposition force
being evaluated.
The officer must also have: (1) courage of conviction; (2) a
willingness to develop and express "gut" feeling; (3) basic tactical
aptitude; (4) an ability to explore theorhetical hypotheses; and (5)
skill in developing indicators without substantial multiple source
intelligence.
Assuming the above conditions are met, the TAG systems should have
reasonable chance of success. Further, it is assumed that a carefully
tructured TAG system would produce effective results against any type
of terrorist force operating in a rural or urban environment. The
basic is that evaluative criteria must be adjusted to fit each unique
set of circumstances. Additionally, the TAG system must be employed by
operatives with relevant tactical experience, basic analytical ability,
arid a large measure of common sense. Prior to developing a TAG model,
the following questions must be carefully answered for each specific
terrorist group considered:
a. What ideological, organizational and tactical patterns are clearly
evidenced?
b. How do known doctrinal or training concepts compare with specific
operational approaches?
c. What tactics would be feasible given probable limitations of men,
money and material?
d. How do various subversive elements overcome the social, economic,
political, psychological and security strengths of the target area?
e. What types of activities are being directed against the target and
how do these relate to known vulnerabilities?
f. What are the probable limits of available communication,
transportation, support and intelligence?
g. How do terrorists adapt themselves to limit handicaps caused by
adverse climate, weather, demography or geography?
h. What types of countermeasures must be overcome and how will these
efffect operational concepts?
i. What is the best estimate of probable modus operandi given known
limitations?
In short, the effective development of a workable TAG system is
predicated on minimal all-source intelligence and a studied evaluation
of specific subversive forces, in the local, national or international
environment in which they exist. Each scrap of information is thus
evaluated to determine the validity of activity patterns which are
initially presented as plausible theories. A logic sequence is then
developed to relate theories to available data, terrorist operational
options, and probable events.
7. ITC SYSTEM
The Intelligence-Targeting Collation or ITC System has been effectively
used to provide a visual system for displaying, locating, and dating
large quantities of information on a terrorist or guerrilla force. It is
basically a plot-board technique that makes data easier to interpret
when compared with most map and/or record systems.
In the course of daily plotting, an analyst uses the ITC Plot Board to
closely observe developing patterns of activity. He contemplates the
purpose of any single action as it relates to potential target proximity
and sequential relationship to all other intelligence data. After a
brief period, trends will begin to emerge, thus allowing the analyst to
make accurate projections on terrorist or guerrilla strength, location,
deployment, modus operandi and/or intentions.
The ITC System clearly reveals activity signatures that generally hold
true for all opposition forces operating in a particular area. This
allows an analyst to assume the role of a master chess player who can
view the board and determine various logical moves of an opponent.
Obviously, these signatures will vary according to environment, types
of conflict and standard methodology of the hostile force. As an
example, urban terrorist signatures might be revealed by the following
types of information input:
a. Police report increasing theft of explosive or incendiary materials.
b. Informant observes suspect dissidents conducting a "casual meeting."
c. Intelligence asset discovers a terrorist operation against a likely
target for violence.
d. A technical penetration operation reveals intentions for future
terrorist actions.
e. Surveillance team follows suspect terrorist during his recon of
local airport.
Although certain specific intelligence reports may clearly indicate
intended hostile actions, the ITC System can provide a much broader
and deeper insight regarding the total threat. It also facilitates the
expedient collation of intelligence that might otherwise be handled on
a fragmented or delayed basis which precludes effective overall analysis
and counteraction within a limited time frame. An ITC System may be
established for a rural or urban environment, using the following
procedural approach:
a. Obtain a roll of lined graph paper with grids on an approximate
map scale of 1:25,000 for rural areas, or 1:10,000 for urban areas.
b. Bind the graph paper to chartboards or cardboard squares roughly
3 x 4 feet in size.
c. Number graph lines on bottom and right side of chartboard to
correspond with Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) grid numbers for
selected target areas.
d. Match and bind corresponding map sections to reverse side of each
board or on a feasible alternate location.
e. Establish secure work area where analyst may handle and plot
sensitive intelligence data on boards.
f. Develop symbol code to identify plotted sources of information,
e.g.:
SOURCE SYMBOL
(1) Agent X
(2) Informant O
(3) Penetration *
(4) Incident @
(5) Photography #
(6) Historical ^
(7) Prisoners <
(9) Research >
(10) Rumors &
[ed. note - symbols in report substituted by above alphanumerics.]
a. Establish color codes for various time periods of information
acquisition, and plot source symbols in appropriate time color. (NOTE:
Color normally should indicate specific 10 - 30 day time periods.)
h. If sourcing of data and dates must be exacting, develop sequential
number codes for intelligence reports and place same numeric code
beside plotted symbol, e.g., 3 - 84 for the 84th report during March
of that year. (Use card box to maintain record, of codes and reference
to source reporting related to same.)
i. In conjunction with source codes, utilize two-letter alphabetic
vocabulary code to identify and plot critical information reported,
e.g.:
ACTIVITY CODE
Action AC
Agent AG
Assassination AS
Base BA
Bombing BM
Cache CH
Cadre CA
Clandestine Meeting CM
Communication CN
Demonstration DM
Enemy Agent EA
Espionage ES
Explosives EX
Facility FA
Guerrilla GU
Headquarters HQ
Homicide HC
Hospital HS
Hostage HT
Incendiary Device ID
Kidnapping KN
Killed KL
Prison PR
Raid RD
Route RU
Signal SG
Supplies SU
Supply Cache SC
Terrorist TR
Traffic TF
Unknown Activity UA
Vehicle VH
Weapons (Small Arms) WP
(NOTE: Vocabulary code symbols given are exemplary only and may be
reduced or expanded as the situation dictates, These codes may also be
used on combination as appropriate, e.g., SQ/AB for squad sized ambush.)
j. Supplementary symbols can be added as needed, e.g., small arrows
attached to source code symbols to indicate direction of movement.
Example ITC Plot Board
[diagram omitted]
NOTE: Use fine-line ink pens to record symbols on plot board. Make
symbols and alpha-numeric lettering as small as possible without being
unreadable.
[about 5 pages deleted]
25X1C10c
11. PRE- CRISES POINTERS
1. Plan imaginative delaying tactics that can be used to "stall"
negotiations with terrorists and gain time needed to fully explore
various options for attaining hostage release.
2. contingency plans to avoid premature and unplanned direct
confrontation with terrorists.
3. Develop themes for humanitarian appeals designed to persuade
terrorists that they are losing support for their "cause."
4. Game probable negotiated release situations to determine advance
guarantees needed to assure that hostages will be returned unharmed
simultaneous with the granting of any concessions to terrorists.
S. Determine transportation and security options assuming terrorists
will probably demand aircraft for flight to a safe haven.
6. Establish various contingency reaction plans among and between all
governments that might possibly be concerned with any anticipated
terrorist action.
7. Take necessary steps to be prepared to control terrorist
communications and movement to prevent guidance direction or
assistance from outside sources.
8. Game all possible future actions with various government security
elements to preclude uncoordinated panic reaction during any terrorist
incident.
VI. INCIDENT PROCEDURES
1. PROTECTIVE REACTION CHART
TERRORIST ACTION EXAMPLE REACTION
1. Assault Escape, evade, initiate emergency commo and/or
attempt delaying action until security reaction
force can break attack.
2. Kidnapping If possible and advisable, attempt to escape and
evade. Activate emergency or other warning device.
If captured, cooperate with your captors without
divulging sensitive intelligence or compromising
information. In response to kidnapping, pre-planned
rescue and/or negotiated release to be attempted.
3. Ambush Move away from fields of fire, seek protective
cover, and if armed, immediately return fire.
Initiate emergency commo and take evasive action
avoiding exposed or open areas.
4. Bombing Dive for protective cover and lie flat with feet
toward explosion. Activate bomb squads and fire
teams to attempt to limit further damage. Be alert
for second bomb.
5. Hijacking Do not attempt to overpower hijackers unless given
a very reasonable chance for success. Avoid
attracting attention to yourself. If kidnapped as
a result of hijacking, follow above para 2. guidance.
6. Seizure Encirclement or entrapment of terrorists accompanied
by no-bargaining position with demand that terrorists
surrender. Armed surreptitious entry team should be
prepared to attempt release of any captives.
7. Sabotage Attempt to rapidly identify exact type and source
of sabotage. Use search and security teams to
locate follow-on sabotage actions. Screen personnel
with access to target and implennent protective
security procedures.
8. Assassination Immediate reaction must be spontaneous defensive
maneuver to escape particular type of attack. Then
initiate emergency procedures and take evasive
action until security forces arrive. Practice
countersurveillance and good security to avoid
future assassination attempts.
9. Deception Take immediate defensive action until such time as
and threats proven false, particularly in situations where
deception or threats are a prelude to actual attack.
[paragraphs deleted]
25X1C8a
Communication
8. What types of communication are believed or known to be available
to terrorists, and how might these be employed for command control?
9. Has action been taken to disrupt terrorist communications, and if
not, why not?
10. What types of communication systems are being used by security
services, and how are these employed?
11. What capability exists for immediate communication between various
services, command elements within government, and/or the responsible
leadership?
12. What is the status of critical communication, and is there a
possibility that such communications might be delayed or disrupted?
13. In the case of a hostage, is the victim equipped with any
clandestine communication system?
Physical
14. Where, how, and under what conditions are terrorists deployed?
15. What routes of entry and/or escape might be used to gain access
to, or exit from the terrorist's present location?
16. If terrorists use hostages to demand safe passage, what routes
might be used?
17. What physical attributes of the terrorist's present location,
or probable movement routes, would facilitate an ambushand/or other
surprise action?
18. Have detailed maps, building blueprints, utility layouts, and
other physical data been used in answering questions 14 through 17
above?
19. In cases of skyjacking or use of aircraft for escape, what
physical attributes of airports and/or aircraft might be used to
negate on-going or indicated terrorist action?
20. What are the physical advantages and disadvantages of the
terrorist's current location and/or disposition?
Logistics
21. What items of equipment are immediately available to support
operations against terrorists? (Consider weapons, ammo, explosives,
starlight scopes, remote listening devices, cameras, helicopters,
vehicles and other appropriate items.)
22. What equipment is now in use by security services?
23. What equipment is known to be available to terrorists?
24. How might available equipment be employed to negate present
and/or intended terrorist action(s)?
Negotiations
25. Have the terrorists been told that their demands will be met in
order to gain time to develop the best possible response?
26. Has every effort been made to conceal the fact that terrorist
demands might not be met?
27. What preparations have been made to meet terrorist demands in
the event no other alternative is possible?
28. If inaction or a no bargaining position is to be taken, have all
the consequences been fully evaluated?
29. How can any bargaining best be conducted to facilitate release of
any hostages while increasing chances that terrorists will be captured?
Expertise
30. What special skills are available from internal security services?
(Consider bomb disposal squads, snipers, radio direction finding units,
teletap teams, camera crews, technical personnel, communicators, and
others that might be appropriate to the situation.)
31. What special skills are available from the foreign community?
32. What special skills have been evidenced by the terrorists, and
what others might they probably have?
3. IMMEDIATE RESPONSE
[deletion]
25X1C8a
4. HOSTAGE LOCATION
1. If foot movement involved, consider use of trackers and/or tracking dogs.
2. Screen and question. local residents near kidnap scene to attempt to
determine routes of travel.
3. Be prepared to trace telephone calls and/or surveil couriers as one
means to locate general area where hostage is being held.
4. Game possible locations where a specific terrorist group might hold
the hostage in question assuming you have determined who is responsible.
5. Post rewards for information leading to the hostages safe recovery.
6. Organize a systematic search procedure using several small teams
composed of local residents to avoid giving terrorists any advance alert.
7. Utilize intelligence/informant networks to attain leads on terrorist
safehouses or known locations where hostages might be hold.
8. Attempt to monitor all telephone calls and other communications going
to or from suspect area(s).
9. Consider selective use of remote listening devices to help pinpoint
hostage location. (Hopefully, the victim may already be -equipp-od with
a self-activated "bug" so that he and/or the terrorist$ may reveal their
location.)
5. POTENTIAL HOSTAGE NOTES
1. Maintain your dignity and avoid taking any action which might provoke
the terrorists.
2. Start thinking about escape the minute, you are captured. Your best
chance to escape will usually occur during the confusion of the attack.
3. Do not volunteer information about yourself or any other subject.
4. Attempt to convince terrorists that the only hope of accomplishing
their objectives is to assure your safety.
5. Make careful observations regarding the terrorists and the situation
so you can provide vital intelligence to your potential rescuers --
assuming a means of communication has been or will be provided.
6. As one possible means of communication, remember "key" words, phrases,
and gestures you will need to signal a friendly intermediary and/or other
contact.
7. Assess the determination of the terrorists with regard to the
accomplishment of their mission.
8. In appropriate situations, sympathize with the terrorist "cause" and
attempt to convince them of your desire to cooperate, within limits,
which would not embarrass you with your government.
9. Avoid any outward expression of fear, panic, or hatred which might
stimulate an automatic hostile reaction from the terrorist.
10. Convince the terrorists that patience will gain them at least some
of the objectives they seek, that delays or negative responses, are
inevitable but that the local govermment will eventually meet part of
their demands.
11. Attempt to buy time with the above techniques and any others you
can improvise, as you must give your potential rescuers a chance to
fully prepare their response.
TERRORIST OPERATIONAL EXAMPLAR CHART
[Chart adopted for email format. - ed.]
1. Organization
International: Patriotic front, e.g., Palestinian Fedayeen, Communist
or other radical organization. Fanatic individuals.
Local/national: Subversive or extremists. Fanatics and nuts. Armed
guerrillas and/or revolutionaries. Action arm and/or legal apparat
of international terrorists. Third country groups or individuals.
2. Sponsorship and Leadership
International: External to target area. Communist bloc, patriotic
front, dissident elements and/or governments sympathetic to terrorist
"cause".
Local/national: Internal or external to target nation. Subversives
or revolutionaries acting alone or in conjunction with third country
governments or movements.
3. Planning
International: Detailed and specific with emphasis on high impact
operations having maximum propaganda potential and/or means to extract
concessions. Plans are also designed to directly or indirectly
undermine the strength of a particular target, e.g., Israel.
Local/national: General and non-specific with emphasis on operations
designed to force a target regime to undertake repressive acts which
will alienate a government from their national population.
4. Target Analysis and Intelligence
International: Vulnerable to classic or improvised terrorist attack.
Target meeting above planning criteria. Objective with known and fixed
pattern of activity, or one exposed to detailed targetting assessment
by informants, intelligence agents, or other methods.
Local/national: Exposed to type of attack normally employed by local
terrorist groups. Discriminate or indiscriminate with primary objective
being to "cow" a target population. Intelligence only required for
discriminate targets and this usually provided by existing network of
agents and/or informants.
5. Targets
International: Subject to element of surprise. Unprepared for hostile
action. Limited physical defense if fixed, or exposed and undefended if
mobile. Known to lack effective intelligence and/or counterintelligence
capabilities. Meets criteria in 3. and 4., above.
Local/national: Random target of opportunity hit because of immediate
undefended exposure to terrorists, or discriminate and specific target
relatively undefended and/or subject to element of surprise. Selection
primarily based on probable impact as regards objective to "cow"
population or force target regume to initiate repressive acts.
6. Communications
International: Courriers, deaddrops, cutouts, radiom CW, microdot and
diplomatic pouch of governments sympathetic to terrorist cause.
Usually no direct communication between leadership and operatives.
Local/national: Local mail, bamboo telegraph [?], couriers or runners,
deaddrops, cutouts, radio, and direct passage between terrorist cells
or from leadership down.
7. Coordination
International: Decentralized, compartmented and specifically geared to
particular operations. All coordination begins at planning stage and
is designed to provide direction for independent support, intelligence
and action cells.
Local/national: Centralized with limited compartmentation and minimal
directional control. Designed to provide overall guidance on
psychological, political, operational and other objectives for a
subversive movement in which the terrorists may play a major or minor
role.
8. Funding and Logistics
International: Governments sympathetic to terrorist cause provide
clandestine funding and act as a conduit for explosives, weapons,
equipment, or other items. Considerable quantities of logistics
originate from Communist Bloc countries, but seldom pass directly to
terrorists.
Local/national: Robbery, theft, extortion and kidnap operations used
to raise all or portion of needed funds. [?] items are stolen,
purchased on black market or clandestinely provided by external
sponsors.
9. Personnel Selection and Training
International: Any fanatic organization may provide sources of
personnel. Actual selection depends on individual motivation, skills,
and potential cover for access and/or action. General and specific
target training generally accomplished within countries sympathetic
to terrorist cause.
Local/national: Recruits are primarily drawn from dissident elements
of population who are aggravated with their personal situation and
the target regime. Training of cadre usually takes place in Communist
or other revolution exporting third countries. However, many
terrorists receive clandestine training within target nation.
10. Transportation
International: International airlines, stolen vehicles, boats, and/or
any other method compatible with cover and movement requirements
related to covert preparation to hit a particular target.
Local/national: Primarily by foot, local transporation facilities,
and/or stolen vehicles. Sustained rate of high mobility.
11. Support Groups
International: World-wide network of small clandestine cells
designed to provide intelligence and operational support for specific
and isolated acts of terrorism. In some cases AL FATAH and possibly
other terrorist groups also have legal representation in a number of
countries. Individual terrorists may or may not be associated with
local revolutionary and/or subversive organizations.
Local/national: Support cells are usually an integral part of any
terrorist or subversive organization. They may or may not have
independent functional and/or geographic responsibilities, but are
generally located within the immediate area(s) targetted by
terrorists.
12. Documentation
International: Stolen and altered. Obtained under false pretense.
Provided by sympathetic governments. Fabricated and/or obtained
in name of unwitting or deceased subject.
Local/national: Rural based guerrillas seldom use documentation,
whereas urban oriented terrorists or subversives tend to rely on
their cover rather than false documentation. If papers needed,
they are ususally bought or obtained under false pretenses.
13. Basing and Staging
International: Generally non-specific and located as required to
facilitate attack against a specific target. However, governments
sympathetic to terrorist cause will usually provide training bases
and temporary staging areas as needed.
Local/national: Safe areas and houses are normally used to provide
fixed facilities where operations may be planned, prepared, and
rehearsed. Since target options limited to confined geographic
area, basing must be relatively static.
14. Attack Methods
International: Hijacking, kidnapping, bombing, assassination,
seizure, threats and deception. Isolated attacks covering wide
geographic area.
Local/national: Assault, ambush, sabotage, and other methods as
indicated in international profile. Repetitive attacks usually
limited to single national environment.
15. Operational Execution
International: Compartmented, specific, exacting, with attack
group(s) usually isolated from planning or support elements.
Terrorist action may be unwitting individual, composite groups or
dedicated team.
Local/national: Discriminate, indiscriminate, random, or targets of
opportunity usually hit by compartmented terrorist cell. Local
terrorist elements often engage in their own planning and support
activities. Action may be undertaken by unwitting individual,
composite group or dedicated team, as in the case of international
terrorists.
[unreadable paragraph follows]
VIII. BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Andies, Hellmut Rule of Terror, New York: Holt, Rinehart, and
Winston, 1969.
2. Assassination and Political Violence, a Task Force of the National
Commision on the Causes and Prevention of Violence. Washington: U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1969.
3. Arther, Richard 0., and Caputo, William C., Interrogation for
Investigators. William C. Copp and Associates, New York, 1959.
4. Bain, Chester A., Vietnam -- The Roots of Conflict. Englewood
Cliffs, N.J., 1967.
5. Bennett, Richard L., The Black and Tans. Boston: Houghton Miffin
Co., 1959.
6. Bern Major H. von Dach, Total Resistance. Boulder, Colorado:
Panther Publications, 1965.
7. Black, Cyril E., and Thornton, Thomas P., Communism and Revolution.
Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1964.
8. Bocca, Geoffrey, The Secret Army. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-
Hall, Inc., 1968.
9. Brown, Robert M., The Electronic Invasion. John F. Rider Inc., New
York, 1966.
10. Browne, Malcolm W., The New Face of War. Indianapolis: The Dobbs
Merrill Co., 1965.
11. Clark, Michael K., Algeria in Turmoil. Now York: Frederick A.
Praeger, 1959.
12. Cook, Fred J., The Secret Rulers. Duell, Sloan, Pearce, New York,
1966.
13. Cross, James Eliot, Conflict in the Shadows. Now York: Doubleday &
Co., 1963.
14. Crozier, Brian, South-East Asia in Turmoil. Baltimore: Pengin
Books, 1965.
15. Davies, James Chowning, ed. When Men Revolt and Why: A Reader in
Political Violence and Revolution. Now York, Free Press, 1971.
16. Dienstein, William, Technics for the Crime Investigator. Charles C.
Thomas. Publisher, Springfield, Illinois, 1965.
17. Dubois, Jules, Fidel Castro. Indianapolis: The New Bobbs-Merrill Co.,
1959.
18. Eckstein, Harry, ed. Internal War. New York: The Free Press of
Glencoe, 1964.
19. Egen, Frederick W., Plainclothesman. Arco Publishing Company, Inc.,
New York, 1963.
20. Endleman, Shalom, ed. Violence in the Streets. Chicago, Quandrangle,
1968.
21. Frank, Gerold. The Deed. New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc., 1963.
22. Giap, General Vo Nguyen, The South Vietnam People Will Win. Hanoi:
Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1965.
23. Gibson, Walter B., The Fine Art of Spying. Crossett and Dunlap, New
York, 1965.
24. Greene, Lt. Col. T. N., ed. The Guerrilla -- and How to Fight Him.
New York; Frederick A. Praeger, 1962.
25. Gross, Feliks, The Seizure of Political Power in a Century of
Revolutions, New York: Philosophical Library, 1958.
26. Guzman, Campos, Mons., German, Fals Borda, Orlando, and Umana Luna,
Eduardo, La Violencia en Colombia vols. 1 and 2. Bogota: Ediciones Tercer
Mundo, 1963.
27. Harvey Malachi L. and Cross, John C., The Informer In Law Enforcement.
Charles C. Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, Illinois, 1962.
28. Hazelet, John C., Police Report Writing. Charles C. Thomas, Publisher,
Springfield, Illinois, 1960.
29. Heisel, James H., Counter Revolution. Atherton Press, New York, 1966.
30. Hoover, J. Edgar, Masters of Deceit. Cardinal Edition Pocket Books Inc.,
New York, 1961.
31. Hosmer, Stephen T., Viet Cong Repression and Its Implications for the
Future. Lexington Heath Lexington Books, 1970.
32. Janowitz, Morris, Social Control of Escalated Riots. Chicago,
University of Chicago Press, 1968.
33. Jenkins, Brian Michael, "The Five Stages of Urban Guerrilla Warfare:
Challenge of the 1970s". RAND, July 1971.
34. Kirk, Paul L. and Bradford, Lowell W., The Crime Laboratory. Charles
C. Thomas, Publisher, Springfield, Illinois, 1965.
35. Kitson, Frank, Low Intensity Operations. Stackpole, 1971.
36. Koontz, Harold and O'Donnell, Cyril, Principles of Management. McGraw
Hill Book Company, New York - Toronto London.
37. Leiden, Carl and Schmitt, Karl M., eds. The Politics of Violence.
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, Inc., 1968.
38. Lenz, Robert R., Explosives and Bomb Disposal Guide. Springfield,
Ill., Thomas, 1965.
39. Mallin, Jay, Terror in Viet Nam. Princeton: D. Van, Nostrand Co.,
1966.
40. MacCarthy, J. M., ed. Limerick's Fighting Story. Tralec, Ireland:
Anvil.
41. Marx, Karl, Capital. New York:International Publishers Co., 196-1.
42 Masotti, Louis H., ed. "Urban Violence and Disorder", Issue 11:4 of
American Behavioral Scientist, March - April, 1968.
43. Mendel, Arthur P., ed. Essential Works of Marxism. New York: Bantam.
44. Momboisse, Raymond M., Blueprint of Revolution. Springfield, Ill.,
Thomas, 1970.
45. Momboisse, Raymond M., Confrontations, Riots, Urban Warfare.
Sacramento, California, MSM Enterprises, 1969.
46. Momboisse, Raymond M., "Riot Protection; Check List for Business"
Sacramento, California, MSM Enterprises, 1968.
47. Momboisse, Raymond M, Riots, Revolts, and Insurrections.
Springfield, Ill., Thomas. 1967.
48. Moss, Robert, The War for the Cities. New York, Coward, McCann &
Goeghogan, Inc., 1972. British edition entitled: Urban Guerrillas.
49. Most;, Robert, "Urban Guerrillas in Uruguay", Problems of Communism
September - October 1971, pp. 14 - 23.
50. Moss Robert, Urban Guerrilla Warfare. With an Appendix: Minimanual
of the Urban Guerrilla by Carlos Marighella. (Adelphi Papers, No. 79).
London, The International Institute for Strategic Studies, August 1971.
51. Moss, Robert, Urban Guerrillas in Latin America. (Conflict Studies
No. 8). London, Institute for the Study of Conflict, 1970.
52. Mydans, Carl and Shelley, The Violent Peace. New York: Atheneum, 1968.
53. Nunez, Carlos and Jose Diaz. The Tupamaros; Urban Guerrilla Warfare
in Uruguay. New York, Liberated Guardian, 1970.
54. Oppenheimer, Martin and George Lakey. A Manual for Direct Action.
Chicago, Quandrangle, 1965.
55. Oppenheimer, Martin. The Urban Guerrilla. Chicago, Quandrangle, 1969.
56. O'Sullivan, B. Dalton, Crime Detection. The O'Sullivan Publishing
House, Chicago, Illinois, 1928.
57. Penkovskiy, Oleg., The Penkovskiy Papers. Avon Company, New York,
1966.
58. Pfiffner, John M. and Sherwood, Frank P. Administrative Organization.
Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1960.
59. Phillips, R. Hart, Cuba -- Island of Paradox. New York: McDowell,
Obolensky, 1959.
60. Pike, Douglas. The Viet-Cong Strategy of Terror. Saigon: United
States Mission, Viet-Nam, 1970.
61. Powell, William, The Anarchist Cookbook. Now York, Lyle Stuart, 1971.
62. Powers, Thomas, Diana: The Making of a Terrorist. Boston, 1971.
63. Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders. New
York: Bantam Books, 1968.
64. Reed, David, 111 Days in Stanleyville. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.
65. Riots,- Civil and Criminal Disorders -- Hearings before the Permanent
Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Government Operations,
United States Senate. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1970.
66. Rosenthal, Carl F., Phases of Civil Disturbances: Characteristics and
Problems. Washington, D. C. , Center for Research in Social System. June,
1969.
67. Russell, Charles and Hildner, Robert E. "Urban Insurgency in Latin
America", Air University Review, September October 1971, pp. 54 - 64.
68. Soderman, Harry arid O'Connell, John J., Modern Criminal Investiation.
Funk and Wagnalls Company. New York, 1952.
69. Sondern Frederic, Jr., Brotherhood of Evil -- The Mafia. Farrar,
Straus, and Cudahy, New York, 1959.
70. Stahl, 0. Glenn, Public Personnel Administration. Harper & Row, New
York, 1962.
71. Stoffel, Joseph F., Explosives and Homemade Bombs. Springfield, M.,
Thomas, 11962.
72. Stoner, John K. "Riot Control Doctrine", Military Review. February
1965, pp. 40 - 44.
73. Suchlicki, Jaime, University Students and Revolution in Cuba,
1920-1968. Coral Gables: University of Miami Press, 1969.
74. Taber, Robert, The War of the Flea. New York: Lyle Stuart, 1965.
75. To Establish Justice, To Insure Domestic Tranquility. Final report
of the National Commission on Causes and Prevention of Violence. New
York: Bantam Books, 1970.
76. Trotsky, Loon, Stalin. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1941.
77. United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of
Investigation, "Prevention and Control of Mobs and Riots." Washington,
D.C. FBI, 3 April 1967.
78. United States Mission in Viet Nam. A Study Viet Cong Use of Terror.
Saigon, 1967.
79. Whelton, Charles, Skyjack! New York: Tower Publications, 1970.
80. Wilson, O.W., Police Administration. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc. New
York, Toronto, London, 1950.
81. Wilson, O.W., Police Planning. Charles C. Thomas, Publisher,
Springfield, IIIinois, 1958.
82. Wilson, 0. W., Police Records. Public Administration Service,
Chicago, Illinois, 1§51.
83. Wolfe, Bertram D., Three Who Made a Revolution. New York: The Dial
Press. 1961.